Search results for: Commercial

Barristers results

185
Barristers
Showing 185 barristers
Showing 185 barristers

Cases results

For the plaintiff in a matter concerning breach of implied term of good faith, unconscionable conduct — this proceeding involved an application for leave to amend statement of claim. Led by P Crutchfield KC, instructed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
Year
Counsel
For a respondent in contract interpretation dispute. Unled, instructed by Strongman & Crouch.
Year
Counsel
For the appellant in a matter concerning the interpretation of a consumer contract in the gaming industry. Led by J T Gleeson SC, instructed by Johnson, Winter Slattery.
For the respondents in a matter concerning commercial arbitration – stay under International Commercial Arbitration Act 1974 – “competence-competence” principle. Instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills.
For the first respondent in case concerning alleged unconscionable conduct. Instructed by Johnson Winter Slattery.
Acting for the plaintiff in an oppression proceeding; instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth.
Acting for the successful respondent at first instance and on appeal in a proceeding concerning the validity and outcome of a shareholders’ meeting, s 249F of the Corporations Act and indemnity costs 
Acting for the appellant in a taxation matter concerning cross-border transfer pricing and arm’s length consideration provisions. With C Peadon and L Currie, instructed by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Followed by Singapore Telecom Australia Investments Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] HCATrans 74.
Acting for the applicant in a taxation matter — review of decision to refuse access to documents related to an audit by the Australian Taxation Office — claim that documents are subject to legal privilege. J de Wijn KC, M Baker KC, and E Latif, instructed by Jones Day.
Year
Counsel
Led by R Sharp KC, with A Martin
Acting for the successful respondent at first instance and on appeal in a proceeding concerning the validity and outcome of a shareholders’ meeting, s 249F of the Corporations Act and indemnity costs.
For the defendant in a contract construction and interpretation dispute. Instructed by Gilbert + Tobin, then King & Wood Mallesons.
Year
Counsel
Acting for the applicant in a contract dispute — injunction. Led by C Juebner SC, instructed by Aptum Legal.
Acting for the successful respondent at first instance and on appeal in a proceeding concerning the validity and outcome of a shareholders’ meeting, s 249F of the Corporations Act and indemnity costs (led by Penny Neskovcin KC, as her Honour then was).
Acting for the appellant—This proceeding concerned a claim by the ACCC that provisions in Port Commitment Deeds entered into by the State of New South Wales and a consortium known as NSW Ports had the purpose and likely effect of substantially lessening competition in contravention of s 45 of the…
Year
Counsel
For second respondent in proceeding considering statutory construction. The matter concerned alleged water damage, for which the applicants contend the defendants are liable. Led by P Thiagarajan.
Year
Counsel
Appeared for an intermediary off-taker in a commercial arbitration relating to power purchase agreements from multiple solar farms. Led by Tom Clarke, instructed by Ashurst.
Year
Counsel
Acted as junior counsel for Plaintiff in commercial lease dispute, led by James WS Peters AM KC, instructed by King & Wood Mallesons.
Acting for a third party in a series of proceedings arising out a defective industrial warehouse (led by Premala Thiagarajan SC, with Alissa Crittenden). Resolved after four weeks of trial.
Acting for ‘Grocon’ in a matter concerning commercial guarantees in insolvency. Led by P Fary SC, instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright. Following Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 2) [2021] FCA 1344; No (3) [2022] FCA 1280.
57
Cases