Cases

Refine search

Case title
Practice area
Barrister
Year
Acting for the respondent in a case concerning professional legal privilege, involving documents produced in an investigation into a cyber-attack. Instructed by King & Wood Mallesons.
For the plaintiffs in matter concerning legal professional privilege. Instructed by Slater & Gordon Limited and Phi Finney McDonald.
For the applicant in matter concerning questions of legal professional privilege. Led by S McNicol QC, instructed by the Australian Government Solicitor.
For the respondent in a case concerning legal professional privilege. With R Chaile, instructed by HWL Ebsworth Lawyers.
For respondent in legal privilege matter. Led by S McNicol SC, instructed by Clayton Utz. The proceeding concerned an application by the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) seeking to quash the decision of the Registered Organisations Commissioner to investigate whether the AWU had breached relevant provisions of the Workplace Relations Act…
This was a successful appeal in which the Full Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination and privilege against self-exposure to a civil penalty can be invoked to resist the production of documents under a civil search order (i.e. an Anton Piller order). The Court held that, in contrast to…
The decision concerned an application brought by AB (the Commissioner of Police) and EF seeking to prevent CD (The Director of Public Prosecutions) from disclosing to a number of convicted persons that their barrister (EF) was a registered police informer while she acted for them. The Victorian Supreme Court dismissed…
The decision concerned an application brought by AB (the Commissioner of Police) and EF seeking to prevent CD (The Director of Public Prosecutions) from disclosing to a number of convicted persons that their barrister (EF) was a registered police informer while she acted for them. The Victorian Supreme Court dismissed…
Trial of breach of contract and estoppel claims before Sloss J of the Supreme Court of Victoria
Litigation brought by the Essendon Football Club and James Hird in the Federal Court.
Administrative law action concerning legality of investigation by ASADA and the AFL (with Neil Young QC and Dr Catherine Button)

Refine search

Case title
Practice area
Barrister
Year